Home
Feature Reviews
Live Photos
Flashback Reviews
Media
Reviews in Brief
Tour Dates
News
Release Dates
Sound Off
Giveaways
MusicianConnect
5 Questions
Contact/Staff
Terms & Conditions


HELP SUPPORT ROCK-IS-LIFE.COM

www.mymusiclawfirm.com

5 Questions with...

clock hands strangle
Todd Portnowitz of CLOCK HANDS STRANGLE
www.myspace.com/clockhandsstrangle

1. If I knew absolutely nothing about Clock Hands Strangle, how would you describe the group’s music to me?
-- We’re a band that’s as interested in literature as we are in music, so the songs often center around the lyrics and can take a bit of patience to warm up to. Our song structures are untraditional--the music conforms to the lyrics, whatever shape those may take--particularly with the newer material we’ve been writing, so there’s not as much to cling on to as there would be in your average pop song.

Our sound can range anywhere from folk to pop to rock n’ roll, and it changes pretty significantly the more we write, so we have most of the venues in Florida confused as to what exactly we’re doing. The goal of our music lines up more closely with the goal of music in the ‘60s and ‘70s than it does with anything today—to create something that engages as well as entertains.

2. If I were to buy your new album Red Shift/Blue Shift, what songs should I pay particular attention to and why?
-- “Redshift/Blueshift,” though we’ve never really thought of it as a concept album, is set up based on the two terms from astronomy that it carries in its title. “Redshifted” objects—planets, stars, galaxies—are moving away from the earth and “Blueshifted” objects are moving toward the earth, and so the first half of the album deals with expansion, and the second half with contraction. The point is, the album functions as a whole, each track a shade different than the other, and so it would be difficult to enumerate a few as demanding “particular attention.” It wouldn’t hurt, however, to listen a bit more carefully to the opening track and closing track, titled ‘Redshift’ and ‘Blueshift’ respectively, which bookend the album and provide a sort-of guide for the listener.

3. When and where did the band form, and where did the name come from? -- We formed in 2004 in Melbourne, Florida. Originally there were four of us, but after playing a few shows around town Cristian joined the band on trombone and keyboard. Toward the end of 2006 we had a “changing of the drummers,” picking up Adam from Jason Choi and the Sea, a local band and Team Grizzly label-mate. The majority of us are now living in downtown Orlando, in a house that formerly had a Russian flag up in the front yard—it was torn down by a few anonymous, close-minded children of McCarthy, who also spray-painted black over our touring van’s license plate.

4. What was your worst on stage experience? What was your best?
-- We did this “Battle of the Bands” in a local high school auditorium, I think it was around 2005, that had to be our worst show. “Battles” are always overcrowded and so the set-up and tear-down alone are a pain, and I remember Brian broke a string on bass early in the set and I broke a string on guitar later on. I think we ended up just putting down our instruments and calling it a day after a few songs. We’ve had a few bad “off-stage” experiences as well, such as being denied entry into Canada at the Vermont border…

Our best “on-stage” experience is when Nick had a sexual eruption on lead. The whole band was taking it slow, not rushing the stroke, and one thing led to another

5. Do you think that the Internet (whether it be Internet radio, legal downloading, MySpace, streaming audio, etc.) is a good tool for musicians or is it a bad thing because it hinders profits?
-- Tough question. I’m not sure what you mean by that last word “profits” however, because that would involve us making more than we put in. For a band like us, who can only really afford online distribution (on a wide scale, anyways), we’d be forced to say that the internet is a good tool.

As for the big picture, it’s good and bad, though I think mostly good. More people hear your music. It’s better for the consumers, which is a good thing, and that seems to be happening less and less in capitalism. Not every band is Radiohead however, and can’t count on releasing a priceless album and still banking. I think the music industry is at the stage where it’s trying to figure out how to handle the sale of music now that it’s predominantly digital, so we’ll have to see what happens. As the internet becomes a bigger monster music won’t be the only industry having to refigure its sales techniques…it’s already happening to the film industry. Look at the writer’s strike. The debate itself is shape-shifting as the internet becomes a more efficient network, so it’s impossible to even argue. Or maybe it’s a simpler, moral question about property? Have I made this better or worse?

The real question is one of value. When you purchase an album from the record store (Best Buy, Wal-Mart) you have something tangible, something that you’ve paid for and have expectations about. Does music mean less when there’s no album to hold and no price to pay? No one in our band, of course, has downloaded music illegally…but…if one of us had…we’d probably listen to it just like we would music we’d purchased. If anything, we've become more critical. In a way, it pushes bands to improve their content—there’s not as much room for flare and gimmicks without the advantage of cover art and fancy packaging. A musician’s success is more and more at the mercy of the listener, and, without record labels acting as necessary middle-men, there’s a more direct connection between the artist and whomever’s purchasing the art—that can’t be a bad thing.

 


 

This space for rent

visit The Guitar Shelter



 

Google
 

© 2006 Rock Is Life, LLC